December 19, 2000
GOVERNMENT PAYMENTS TO
ILLINOIS GRAIN FARMS
Federal government payments have shored up net incomes on Illinois grain farms
during the extended period of low commodity prices occurring since 1998. This
article lists government payments received by crop farms in 2000. Impacts on farm
decision-making then are examined.
Net Farm Incomes and Government Payments
A study conducted by the University of Illinois estimated net farm incomes
for 1,037 grain farms located in Illinois. These 1,037 farms are enrolled in Illinois
Farm Business Farm Management (FBFM) and have an average of 833 tillable acres.
During the decade of the 1990s, net farm income on these farms averaged between
$45,000 and $50,000 per farm. Net farm income for 2000 is projected at $32,414
per farm, continuing a string of low incomes occurring in 1998 ($13,827 average
net income) and 1999 ($33,180).
In 2000, government payments received by these farms is projected at $50,277
Without these payments, average net farm income would have been negative in
2000. These payments come from four programs:
1. Agricultural and Marketing Transition (AMTA) payments. AMTA payments
result from Production Flexibility Contracts authorized in the Federal Agricultural
Reform and Improvement (FAIR) Act of 1996. For the 1,037 Illinois grain farms,
these payments averaged $12,379 per farm, or 25 percent of the $50,277 total government
payments received by these grain farms. For these farms, AMTA payments averaged
$21 per operator acre. (An operator acre equals an acre on which revenue is earned.
One cash rent or one owned acre equals one operator acre. One share rent acre
where revenue is split 50-50 between the landlord and tenant equals one-half operator
In 2000, AMTA payments are scheduled to decline by 19 percent. AMTA payments
are based on a farmís program yields and per bu. payment rates. The 2000 payment
rates are $.334 per base corn bu. and $.588 per base wheat bu. The rate for corn
in 2001 is $.269 per bu. The rate for wheat in 2001 is $.474 per bu.
AMTA payments will again decline in 2002. Payment rates are estimated at $.25
per bu. for corn and $.44 per bu. for wheat. Under the 1996 FAIR Act, payments
are scheduled to end in 2002.
2. Market Loss Assistance (MLA) payments. MLA payments are additional
payments resulting from special legislation passed by the U.S. Congress. MLA payments
have occurred in 1998, 1999, and 2000. In 2000, MLA payments averaged $13,451
per farm on the 1,037 farms. MLA payments account for 27 percent of total government
payments received by these Illinois grain farms averaging $22 per operator acre.
The emergency legislation authorizing MLA payments in 2000 do not provide for
payments in 2001. Therefore, MLA payments will not occur in 2001 unless the U.S.
Congress passes legislation authorizing additional payments.
3. Oilseed payments. Oilseed payments again result from special legislation
passed by the U.S. Congress. Oilseed payments have been made for production occurring
in 1999 and 2000. The 2000 payment for the 1,037 farms is projected to average
$2,365 per farm, or 5 percent of total government payments received by these farms.
These payments average about $4 per operator acre. Similar to MLA payments, an
oilseed payment for 2001 is not authorized. Therefore, Congress will have to pass
legislation for Oilseed payments to continue in 2001.
4. Loan Deficiency Payments (LDP) and Marketing Loan payments. In 2000,
estimated LDP and Marketing Loan payments for the 1,037 grain farms are $22,082
per farm, or 50 percent of total government payments received by these farms.
The LDP and Marketing Loan programs will be intact for 2001. Amount of payments
will depend on the level of commodity prices after harvest next year. Payments
will occur if commodity prices are below loan rates. In Illinois, 2000 loan rates
averaged about $1.95 for corn and $5.45 for soybeans.
There is considerable uncertainty about the form and level of government payments
in coming years. For 2001, the LDP and Marketing Loan programs will provide payments
when market prices are below loan rates, providing a price floor near $1.95 for
corn and $5.45 for soybeans given that marketing and LDP pricing decisions are
made in sync with one another.
However, total AMTA, MLA, and Oilseed payments are not known. The lowest possible
payment in 2001 is the scheduled AMTA payment. For the 1,037 farms, this payment
will average $16 per operator acre in 2001. In 2000, AMTA, MLA, and Oilseed payments
total $47 per operator acre; hence, the lowest possible payment is $31 per operator
acre less than received in 2000. Many political observers believe that the U.S.
Congress will pass legislation continuing MLA and Oilseed payments in 2001. This
legislation may not have the form of previous emergency legislation and may build
in counter-cyclical features into payments.
At this point in time, planning only to receive the scheduled AMTA payments
seems prudent. Balancing cash inflows and outflows at scheduled AMTA payments
places a farm in a position to weather adverse events. Receiving additional government
payments, if any, will then provide a cash flow cushion.
Uncertainties also exist concerning what form government programs will take
after payments from the 1996 FAIR Act expires in 2002. It is highly likely that
the next farm bill will continue some form of payments. So far much of the policy
discussion has centered on making payments counter-cyclical Ė increasing during
periods of low incomes and decreasing in periods of high incomes.
The level of payment after 2002 obviously has critical impact on cash rental
and farmland purchase decisions. In Illinois, the 1996 FAIR Act essentially built
in revenue of roughly $20 per operator acre in the form of scheduled AMTA payment
for 1996 through 2002. These scheduled payments allowed higher bids for cash rents
and, to some extent, increased farmland prices. The level of payments after 2002
will impact economical cash rent bids.
It still is too early to say what the level of payments
will be after 2002. Hence, the impact of cash rents and farmland prices cannot
Issued by: Gary Schnitkey
Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics